Curse

Tiltowait · Jun 16, 2007, 11:49 AM // 11:49

After once again doing a Deep run and having to reorder the twelve person team a couple of times I thought there has to be a simpler way than kicking and reinviting people. This issue also arises in various PvP settings such as HA and GvG where party reorders are periodically required.

Would like a toggle button where the team leader can reorder the people in the group.

Jaythen Tyradel · Jun 16, 2007, 12:48 PM // 12:48

/signed

I have done PVE missions/PVP arenas where people keeping doing this just to organized where healers/warriors,rangers/spellcasters are so they can focus on keeping track of how everyone. From what I understand this for the monks benefit.

Not a necessity, but if possible to implement, I would agree to it.

valen.vendetta · Jul 18, 2007, 04:53 PM // 16:53

/signed

it is very annoying to have to kick people and have them get mad cause they didnt know you were re ordering

Boon · Jul 18, 2007, 10:33 PM // 22:33

Yea it gets annoying when you have to keep reordering the list if a person errors out or something happens to someone who has to b on the of the list and you have to reorder the whole party.

I suggest having the party list where you can drag and drop people to sort the list.

Enix · Jul 19, 2007, 02:34 AM // 02:34

it would be nice if there were up/down arrows next to people's names on the party list so everyone could put people where they wanted them.

genofreek · Jul 19, 2007, 02:38 AM // 02:38

/signed

When I play a monk, it's annoying as hell to have a warrior sandwiched in between spellcasters who never get close to combat.

Why can't we do this already?

NeonXero · Jul 19, 2007, 05:36 AM // 05:36

Sounds like a good idea to me - not sure of the best way to implement it into the interface though .-.

/sign

Keneth · Jul 19, 2007, 05:01 PM // 17:01

/signed of course, and this should include changing the leadership of a party.

Amon Warrior · Jul 19, 2007, 05:04 PM // 17:04

/signed

It's one of those things you don't use all the time but is VERY useful when you do so...

Dmitri3 · Feb 03, 2009, 12:58 AM // 00:58

I'm performing thread-necromancy! /signed

Be glad I did necromancy and not create a new thread. :P

Kattar · Feb 03, 2009, 01:08 AM // 01:08

Quote:

Sardelac Rule #8 - Bumping old threads in Sardelac Sanitarium, with the aim to renew the discussion, or adding to old discussion is allowed providing the idea posed in the thread has not already been implemented.

Just make sure you're actually adding something new to the discussion. Bumping just to say "signed" isn't really adding anything.

Add more, or I'll have to close this. Thanks.

Spike Stritter · Feb 03, 2009, 03:56 AM // 03:56

/signed

i would also like to see the party leader changed if there is a 2/3 or 3/4 vote on it...this would help with afk party leaders.

dawnmist · Feb 03, 2009, 09:33 AM // 09:33

/signed

When advertising for a party in party search (e.g. ferrying to Docks), if someone contacts you to join *they* become party leader and the advertising is automatically cancelled.

Which is a nuisance.

Being able to get them to reorder the party to become leader again without having to drop out and reform would be useful.

Dmitri3 · Feb 03, 2009, 11:29 AM // 11:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katsumi

Just make sure you're actually adding something new to the discussion. Bumping just to say "signed" isn't really adding anything.

Add more, or I'll have to close this. Thanks.

Well, there's not much to add, but...
Reforming isn't as much as a nuisance in GvG as in other areas. You can easily find people in your GH and order them up.

In other areas though, HA for example, you are bound to lose someone when ordering. That adds in more time to forming up and takes it away from actually playing. Then of course someone needs to reroll a char and you're basically doing the whole thing over 3-4 times before any action... it is kinda discouraging.

MithranArkanere · Feb 03, 2009, 04:47 PM // 16:47

As long as only the leader can sort people again and the leader can relinquish his position to any of the other party members, it's fine with me.

Dmitri3 · Feb 03, 2009, 05:08 PM // 17:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by MithranArkanere

As long as only the leader can sort people again and the leader can relinquish his position to any of the other party members, it's fine with me.

I agree. Would be nice if it worked this way: press and hold designated button while in outpost, then you can easily click and drag members in your party.